This story happened in a small village of urban type. She began to become in ancient times, still Soviet times, when to solve the then -standing housing issue, enterprises were allowed to build housing for their employees in the so -called “economic way”, that is, due to the available funds of the enterprise and with the involvement of their own or hired labor.
So in this village a small industrial enterprise located there built for its employees the so -called “two -sorted” – a house on two owners with separate entrances.
In those days, there was no privatization of housing at all, and no one knew such a word. Two families – Ivanovs and Petrovs – received their separate apartments, were immensely happy and did not know grief. Moreover, their two -apartment building stood on a fairly large land plot of 15 acres. The fact that this land plot was common to the two owners did not bother the neighbors at all. They spent a fairly conditional interior, dividing the earth into two equal shares, put a low fence along the mesh, who could easily step over the child, and began to plant their gardens with layers and other berries.
So the neighbors would live in goodness and sincerity, may the dashing nineties come. Now it is already unknown for what reason the Petrovs decided to leave the village, and this is not so important. Before leaving, they decided to privatize their housing – the benefit of Russian laws began to allow it – and sell it. And since this house was considered a single building, it was divided into two separate apartments. At the same time, the land under the house remained in general use.
Petrov privatized their half of the house, and Ivanovs – their. Why is such a reason, history is silent, but it was not about the privatization of the land plot at the same time.
Petrov sold their half of the house Sidorov and thus the Ivanovs had new neighbors. The Sidorovs were not a couple Petrov, but from the “latest Russians”, and therefore, the first thing they planned was to privatize their part of the land. And here we approached the most important.
The fact is that the location of the land was quite peculiar. On both sides, the plot was surrounded by a deep moat. On the third side, the plot bordered the industrial site, of course, fenced with a high fence. And only one side of the land went outside. The house itself stood on the site so that only its end wall belonging to Sidorov “looked” on the street.
In urban planning, such land plots are called indivisible, that is, for objective reasons, it is impossible to share arbitrarily. In our case, the administration of the village with the filing of the land committee without asking the opinion of the architecture authority allowed Sidorov the privatization of its share of the land plot, highlighting this share according to the previously established Mezhe.
From this moment for the Ivanovs, all their torment began.
Firstly, the Sidorovs along this sword set a thorough fence and made a gate in it so that the Ivanovs could pass from the street to their part of the house. Thus, they made it clear to Ivanov that they, in general, walk around the Sidorovs site.
Further – more. If earlier the Ivanovs, going from the street to the courtyard, calmly walked along the house to their front door, then after a while the Sidorovs decided to end with such a disgrace. How on earthly the Ivanovs should go past their windows along the land owned by them? And they did not come up with anything more cleverly how to put on a chain near the gate in the section separating the site of the fence of a hefty wolfhound. Naturally, now the Ivanovo will have to get to his housing with all kinds of roundabout ways. And no wonder. that the Ivanovs soon fell in complaints of all kinds of authorities.
This example clearly shows how the unprofessional solution to the land issue turns a simple problem into a conflict situation. The solution lies on the surface and is so obvious that you are giving a marriage – why it was impossible to do this initially?
Simply, when Sidorov’s privatization of the land plot, this plot had to be burdened in favor of the Ivanovs by a private easement. In other words, to limit the ownership of the Sidorovs to the land plot by the need for the unhindered passage of the Ivanovs to their part of the house. Naturally, within a specific strip 2-3 meters wide.
Well, since in our case an erroneous decision was originally made, a private easement had to be set in court.